New Rule Suggestion

[instaaled]

I don't think it matters if Hank has to make the trades. Having a trade committee will streamline the process. You have a group of 3 to 5 guys that need to approve each trade with a minimum of lets say 2 approvals. Once you have the two approvals the trade can then be processed by Hank and the thread can be locked. This way Hank only needs to scan the trade board for trades that have already been approved, and can ignore all the others. We can also get rid of the poll which is lame. -decker89



Have at it

[bergie]

I think it's a good Idea. We use this system on some other ligue of virtual hockey I play in

Bergie

[Slapstick]

I cannot agree to this. My problem is that I believe the group needs to have 2 subs in the event that a GM is on the committee. Other than that, I find it a good Idea, so long as 5 GMs are on the thing.

SO for now, my vote is undecided

[saku]

I think 5 gms is good enough plus two subs that could be asked to join in if someone is missing.

[Toronto GM]

how about you do it in rotation? every month 5 new guys will lead the commitee, so that way we have an equal mix of people and oppions and so on, that way we wont have to make trades to make certin people happy because some people wont agree to anything some GM's do....lol....so i'd say we do this in rotation! but for now i'm undecided...'cause how would you choose the 5 guys and how would you make it fair so that there rejecting the trades because there lopsided not because another team got players they want!...so yeah this mite be a lil' confusing but pm me if you want clairity on what i think or what not.....

[losangelesgm]

I say no. Its the GM's fault if they make a bad trade. Let them suffer the consequences.