|
|
Post by abyss on Apr 27, 2006 17:29:52 GMT -5
To Kings:
Brad Boyes
BOS 1st 2006
To Bruins:
Lauri Tukonen
LA 3rd 2008
LA 4th 2006
Yep I accept, I have the depth to be able to move Boyes, losing the 1st hurts though but hopefully I end up in the playoffs lol.
|
|
|
|
Post by losangelesgm on Apr 27, 2006 17:30:54 GMT -5
Deal.
|
|
|
|
Post by abyss on Apr 27, 2006 17:32:21 GMT -5
voted Even, we both get what we want. I get a bonafide good scoring prospect, and he gets a good quality #2 center and a 1st which are always good
|
|
|
|
Post by instaaled on Apr 27, 2006 18:40:50 GMT -5
Kings win...
You do have plenty of depth though, so I suppose it works out.
|
|
|
|
Post by Slapstick on Apr 27, 2006 18:41:06 GMT -5
I find this a fair deal, but LA wins. Also, really the idea of the poll was t oask fairness of a trade, not who wins
|
|
|
|
Post by abyss on Apr 27, 2006 19:53:10 GMT -5
I find this a fair deal, but LA wins. Also, really the idea of the poll was t oask fairness of a trade, not who wins brain fart lol, forgot ;D course I guess if 24 people vote LA then I guess it isn't fair  |
|
|
|
Post by mordak on Apr 27, 2006 20:53:36 GMT -5
I think we need to clarify the point of this trade evaluation. It is basically done so that a GM doesn't sabotage their team. No trades are going to be 100% even. All we really want is to avoid any really really bizarre trades... ie. Crosby for Belak, etc...
|
|
|
|
Post by instaaled on Apr 27, 2006 20:57:33 GMT -5
That was the intended point, yes. I only voted for the Kings because that would be the side I would rather have. In abyss' situation the trade makes sense though, so you can't really say it's uneven. Just slightly tilted towards one side  |
|
|
|
Post by Slapstick on Apr 28, 2006 11:31:57 GMT -5
Wait, Crosby for Belak is not fair? Then how has Belak been on the Leafs for so long?
But then again, the Penguins have not won a cup since getting Crosby
|
|
