|
|
Post by abyss on Apr 25, 2006 16:40:05 GMT -5
the trade still hasn't gone through, Walker has a NTC and needs to be diciplined before you do it. eventually he'll request a trade and then he can go, otherwise its getting rejected.
please dicipline him first, then do the trade the next day or something.
|
|
|
|
Post by instaaled on Apr 25, 2006 17:19:12 GMT -5
That's how I traded Recchi  |
|
|
|
Post by Slapstick on Apr 25, 2006 18:11:32 GMT -5
And I sakic. I had to punish him a whole lot of times, so just let loose on the button
|
|
|
|
Post by abyss on Apr 25, 2006 18:46:54 GMT -5
And I sakic. I had to punish him a whole lot of times, so just let loose on the button he isn't on my team, either Brad or Hank have to do that |
|
|
|
Post by Slapstick on Apr 25, 2006 19:01:43 GMT -5
OK I am lost. I was just telling everyone how I had to trade Sakic by punishing him a whole lot
|
|
|
|
Post by abyss on Apr 26, 2006 21:14:34 GMT -5
bump.
would be great to get walker on my team (and the others).
please dicipline him until he requests a move
|
|
|
|
Post by losangelesgm on Apr 27, 2006 17:55:41 GMT -5
Doesn't disciplining them kinda defeat the purpose of a NTC?
|
|
|
|
Post by instaaled on Apr 27, 2006 18:41:42 GMT -5
Kinda... |
|
|
|
Post by Slapstick on Apr 27, 2006 18:42:13 GMT -5
Well, yeah. But ideally we did not set up these NTC's, and most of us want our own teams
|
|
|
|
Post by losangelesgm on Apr 27, 2006 19:05:50 GMT -5
I thought the idea was to take your fav. team or the team you took to get the Cup even with the NTC's, Salaries, etc. in tact?
I dont know. I think its kinda dumb.
|
|
|
|
Post by instaaled on Apr 27, 2006 19:09:06 GMT -5
Well, I didn't want these rosters to begin with.
Shouldn't I be entitled to get rid of a player I shouldn't have had anyway if we used the rosters I wanted to?
|
|
|
|
Post by Slapstick on Apr 27, 2006 19:33:30 GMT -5
Exactly. Techinically we started at the beginning of the season, so that is where the rosters should have
|
|
saku
AHL Star
Posts: 77
|
Post by saku on Apr 27, 2006 21:50:44 GMT -5
I agree with LA guy. I think NTC are part of the contract as much as the number of years, bonuses and money. If a player has a NTC we shouldn't be able to trade him. Maybe that if the player really diserves to be disciplined and then wants a trade it's ok but, unless that we shouldn't trade them.
|
|
|
|
Post by losangelesgm on Apr 28, 2006 0:58:34 GMT -5
Exactly. Its part of the game. Deal with it.
|
|
|
|
Post by rk2k3 on Apr 28, 2006 4:51:57 GMT -5
Any time you have a player in a deal who has an NTC, you are taking a risk when trading him, so it is not a certainly that the player will accept the trade. Speaking from experience, if the player does not waive the NTC clause, then the trade is dead, since the player does not want go  |
|
